
Radeon R9 380X vs Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 380X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 380X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5500M.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 380X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $58 versus $100 for the Radeon RX 5500M, it costs 42% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 77.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($58) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 380X and Radeon RX 5500M

Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 380X scores 6,131 and the Radeon RX 5500M reaches 5,954 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 380X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 970 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,131+3% | 5,954 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.973 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 970 MHz | 1645 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 111.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380X) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 106 GB/s | 224 GB/s+111% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 380X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 98.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 380X) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 85W-66% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.5 | 70.0+186% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 380X costs 42% less ($42 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 105.7 (Radeon R9 380X) vs 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon R9 380X offers 77.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 380X | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $58-42% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.7+78% | 59.5 |
| Codename | Antigua | Navi 14 |
| Release | November 19 2015 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #394 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















