
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs GeForce GTX 555

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is positioned at rank #469 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $300), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 918.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+918.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and GeForce GTX 555

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 and the GeForce GTX 555 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 555 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 144 (GeForce GTX 555). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,604+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+344% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+186% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 555's 70W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 555). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 70W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0 | 22.9+9% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 90% less ($270 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 909.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $30-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 53.5+909% |
| Codename | Venus | GF116 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | May 14 2011 |
| Ranking | #746 | #849 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















