Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Radeon 540X
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:
Radeon 540X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is positioned at rank 469 and the Radeon 540X is on rank 288, so the Radeon 540X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 540X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 540X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 540X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 540X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 540X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M275X / M375, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 656.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+656.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and Radeon 540X
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Radeon 540X
The Radeon 540X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 5 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1046 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,588 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 and the Radeon 540X reaches 1,588 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon 540X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 512 (Radeon 540X). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 1.071 TFLOPS (Radeon 540X). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1046 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,588 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS+11% | 1.071 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1046 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+25% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 540X has 512 MB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 512 KB (Radeon 540X) — the Radeon 540X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 12 (Radeon 540X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs UVD (Radeon 540X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | UVD |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | VCE |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the Radeon 540X's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 540X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 350W (Radeon 540X). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0 | 31.8+51% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon 540X launched at $99 and now averages $40. The Radeon 540X costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 39.7 (Radeon 540X) — the Radeon 540X offers 649.1% better value. The Radeon 540X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon 540X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $99-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $40-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 39.7+649% |
| Codename | Venus | Lexa |
| Release | January 28 2014 | September 5 2018 |
| Ranking | #746 | #754 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and Radeon 540X
