
Radeon R9 M275X / M375

Seria Radeon HD 7700
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
2014Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌88.7% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 10.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Seria Radeon HD 7700
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $141 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Seria Radeon HD 7700
The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 and the Seria Radeon HD 7700 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 1,604+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS | 3.789 TFLOPS+220% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 512 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 M275X / M375 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and 64-bit on the Seria Radeon HD 7700. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 768 KB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the Seria Radeon HD 7700's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+228% | 6.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 came in at $300, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159. On MSRP, Seria Radeon HD 7700 was 47% cheaper ($141 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 10.1 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 90.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Seria Radeon HD 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $159-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 10.1+91% |
| Codename | Venus | Tahiti |
| Release | January 28 2014 | January 9 2012 |
| Ranking | #746 | #431 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















