Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Performance Spectrum

FirePro M4000
2 GB 33
1,596
+1.3%
brand logoRadeon Vega 3
brand logoRadeon R7 M460
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
4 GB 75
1,575
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 G
brand logoRadeon HD 8750M
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon HD 4870
brand logoRadeon R9 380X
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 75W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • ❌8100% longer card at 82mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 82mm, a 81mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌127.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (1,596 vs 1,575), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro M4000 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
G3D Mark Score
1,596+1%
1,575
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+71%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M275X / M375 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X / M375.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
6
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 82mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
82mm
1mm
Height
0mm
—
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
—
Perf/Watt
48.4+130%
21.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M4000 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300. On MSRP, FirePro M4000 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X / M375 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP
$0-100%
$300
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
5.3
Codename
Chelsea
Venus
Release
June 27 2012
January 28 2014
Ranking
#752
#746
Search FirePro M4000 on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 M275X / M375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.