
Radeon HD 6790 vs Radeon R9 M275X / M375

Radeon HD 6790
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (4 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6790.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6790 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6790 holds the technical lead. Priced at $149 (vs $300), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 100.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($149) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6790 and Radeon R9 M275X / M375

Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6790 scores 1,567 and the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 reaches 1,575 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6790 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 6790) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Raw compute: 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,567 | 1,575 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+25% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.344 TFLOPS+14% | 1.184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6790 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6790) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the Radeon HD 6790 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12_0+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6790) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6790 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M275X / M375's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 6790) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 75W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.4 | 21.0+102% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $149, while the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon HD 6790 costs 50.3% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) vs 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) — the Radeon HD 6790 offers 98.1% better value. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6790 | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $149-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.5+98% | 5.3 |
| Codename | Barts | Venus |
| Release | April 4 2011 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #759 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















