
FirePro M4000
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6790
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M4000
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 240mm, a 158mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6790
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
- ❌192.7% longer card at 240mm vs 82mm.
FirePro M4000
2012Radeon HD 6790
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 240mm, a 158mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
- ❌192.7% longer card at 240mm vs 82mm.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro M4000 better than Radeon HD 6790?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6790 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 18 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 6790

FirePro M4000
FirePro M4000
The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

Radeon HD 6790
Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,596+2% | 1,567 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.344 TFLOPS+94% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 has 1 GB. The FirePro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000) vs None (Radeon HD 6790). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-78% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 82mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 48.4+365% | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4000 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149. The FirePro M4000 costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The FirePro M4000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro M4000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.5 |
| Codename | Chelsea | Barts |
| Release | June 27 2012 | April 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #752 | #759 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













