FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 6790

FirePro M4000

2012Core: 675 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6790

2011Core: 840 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro M4000

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.
  • Measures 82mm instead of 240mm, a 158mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6790

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.
  • 192.7% longer card at 240mm vs 82mm.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro M4000 better than Radeon HD 6790?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,596 vs 1,567 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro M4000 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (33W vs 150W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro M4000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011, more VRAM at 2 GB instead of 1 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro M4000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro M4000 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 1.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 6790 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 6790 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 6790 is 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM, 1,567 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
1080p
low21 FPS29 FPS
medium13 FPS17 FPS
high8 FPS10 FPS
ultra4 FPS5 FPS
1440p
low13 FPS14 FPS
medium7 FPS7 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low5 FPS5 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS2 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
1080p
low38 FPS70 FPS
medium20 FPS40 FPS
high14 FPS28 FPS
ultra10 FPS18 FPS
1440p
low12 FPS31 FPS
medium6 FPS19 FPS
high4 FPS12 FPS
ultra4 FPS9 FPS
4K
low3 FPS9 FPS
medium2 FPS6 FPS
high2 FPS5 FPS
ultra1 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
1080p
low72 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high48 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low54 FPS53 FPS
medium43 FPS42 FPS
high36 FPS35 FPS
ultra27 FPS26 FPS
4K
low36 FPS35 FPS
medium29 FPS28 FPS
high24 FPS24 FPS
ultra18 FPS18 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
1080p
low72 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS56 FPS
high41 FPS47 FPS
ultra31 FPS35 FPS
1440p
low10 FPS53 FPS
medium8 FPS42 FPS
high7 FPS35 FPS
ultra5 FPS26 FPS
4K
low6 FPS35 FPS
medium5 FPS28 FPS
high4 FPS24 FPS
ultra3 FPS18 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4000 and Radeon HD 6790

AMD

FirePro M4000

The FirePro M4000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,596 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6790

The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4000 scores 1,596 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro M4000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4000) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
G3D Mark Score
1,596+2%
1,567
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
512
800+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.344 TFLOPS+94%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 has 1 GB. The FirePro M4000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M4000) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
DirectX
12+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
6+100%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro M4000) vs None (Radeon HD 6790). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M4000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
Encoder
VCE 1.0
None
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4000 draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The FirePro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4000) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 82mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Length
82mm
240mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80
Perf/Watt
48.4+365%
10.4
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro M4000 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149. The FirePro M4000 costs 100+% less ($149 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M4000) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the FirePro M4000 offers Infinity% better value. The FirePro M4000 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureFirePro M4000Radeon HD 6790
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
10.5
Codename
Chelsea
Barts
Release
June 27 2012
April 4 2011
Ranking
#752
#759