Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is positioned at rank #469 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375

#459

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2068%

#461

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1875%

#462

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1870%

#466

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1700%

#467

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1689%

#469

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#470

Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

100%

#471

Radeon R9 M370X

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#472

Radeon HD 8280

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#473

GeForce GTX 850A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#474

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#475

Mobility Radeon HD 5730

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

97%

#476

Radeon R7 A10-7700K

MSRP: $152|Avg: $118

97%

#477

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#479

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire

MSRP: $699|Avg: $150

95%

#480

Radeon HD 8510G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

95%

#481

Radeon R5 M330

MSRP: $120|Avg: $20

95%

#482

Radeon HD 8650G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

94%

#483

GeForce GTX 760A

MSRP: $249|Avg: $40

94%

#484

Radeon R9 M270X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 502.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+502.7%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M275X / M375 Benchmark Check

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Benchmark Check

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Radeon R9 M275X / M375

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 and the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 reaches 1,582 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 800 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
G3D Mark Score	1,575	1,582
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 8.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.184 TFLOPS+93%	0.6144 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	925 MHz+16%	800 MHz
ROPs	16+167%	6
TMUs	40	48+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300).

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
DirectX	12_0	12 (11_1)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	21.0	105.5+402%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150 and now averages $50. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 31.6 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 offers 496.2% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 M275X / M375	Iris Pro Graphics P6300
MSRP	$300	$150-50%
Avg Price (30d)	$300	$50-83%
Performance per Dollar	5.3	31.6+496%
Codename	Venus	Broadwell GT3e
Release	January 28 2014	September 5 2014
Ranking	#746	#755