
Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs Radeon HD 4890

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4890
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is positioned at rank #469 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 4890.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4890 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4890 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $300), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1077.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1077.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and Radeon HD 4890

Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.

Radeon HD 4890
The Radeon HD 4890 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,546 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 and the Radeon HD 4890 reaches 1,546 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4890 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4890). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4890).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575+2% | 1,546 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 800+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+15% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4890 has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 4890's 190W — a 86.8% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4890). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-61% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0+159% | 8.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 4890 launched at $249 and now averages $25. The Radeon HD 4890 costs 91.7% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 61.8 (Radeon HD 4890) — the Radeon HD 4890 offers 1066% better value. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | Radeon HD 4890 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $249-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $25-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 61.8+1066% |
| Codename | Venus | RV790 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #746 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















