Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
VS
FirePro W9000

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs FirePro W9000

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS

FirePro W9000

2012Core: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is positioned at rank 408 and the FirePro W9000 is on rank 317, so the FirePro W9000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#398
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1448%
#400
1312%
#401
1309%
#405
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1190%
#406
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1182%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
100%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
97%
#411
96%
#412
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#413
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
96%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
94%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
93%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
92%
#419
92%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
92%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9000

#302
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9593%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
100%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
99%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
99%
#320
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
99%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
98%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
96%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
92%
#324
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
92%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
90%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
89%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
89%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
86%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
84%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W9000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire.

InsightRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%)
Leading raw performance (+2.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (279mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W9000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W9000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $200), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 36.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+36.8%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)
More affordable ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and FirePro W9000

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

AMD

FirePro W9000

The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the FirePro W9000 reaches 6,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the FirePro W9000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 2,048 (FirePro W9000).

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
G3D Mark Score
6,000
6,157+3%
Architecture
GCN
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+25%
2048

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9000 has 6 GB. The FirePro W9000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit (Dual) vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
512-bit (Dual)+100%
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 12 (FirePro W9000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
DirectX
12
12
Max Displays
0
6
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 3.2.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 3.1
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the FirePro W9000's 274W — a 31.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 350W (FirePro W9000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 279mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
TDP
200W-27%
274W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
279mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
93°C
Perf/Watt
30.0+33%
22.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the FirePro W9000 launched at $3999 and now averages $150. The FirePro W9000 costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 41.0 (FirePro W9000) — the FirePro W9000 offers 36.7% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireFirePro W9000
MSRP
$800-80%
$3999
Avg Price (30d)
$200
$150-25%
Performance per Dollar
30.0
41.0+37%
Codename
Neptune CF
Tahiti
Release
March 1 2014
June 14 2012
Ranking
#348
#390