Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
VS
Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs Arc Graphics 130T

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS
Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is positioned at rank 408 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Arc Graphics 130T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

#398
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1448%
#400
1312%
#401
1309%
#405
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1190%
#406
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1182%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
100%
#409
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
98%
#410
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
97%
#411
96%
#412
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#413
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
96%
#414
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#415
Radeon HD 7620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#416
Radeon R9 M390X
MSRP: $550|Avg: $120
94%
#417
Arc 8-Core iGPU
MSRP: $503|Avg: $400
93%
#418
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $20
92%
#419
92%
#420
Radeon R9 M385
MSRP: $300|Avg: $60
92%
#421
Radeon R5 235
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
#422
Radeon R9 M375X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
91%
#423
Radeon HD 6620G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T

#54
Radeon RX 6800S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
96%
#229
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
525%
#231
476%
#232
474%
#236
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
431%
#237
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
428%
#239
Arc Graphics 130T
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
100%
#240
GeForce MX570 A
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#242
GeForce GT 645
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#252
GeForce 720A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
93%
#253
GeForce GT 520M
MSRP: $60|Avg: N/A
91%
#254
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015))
Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+20.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($200)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Arc Graphics 130T

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Intel

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
G3D Mark Score
6,000
6,208+3%
Architecture
GCN
Xe+
Shading Units
2560+36471%
7

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
XeSS
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit (Dual) vs System.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
307.2 GB/s (Dual)
System
Bus Width
512-bit (Dual)
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs Xe Media Engine.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
Encoder
VCE 1.0
Xe Media Engine
Decoder
UVD 3.1
Xe Media Engine
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
TDP
200W
15W-93%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
30.0
413.9+1280%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 21% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 M290X CrossfireArc Graphics 130T
MSRP
$800
$300-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$200-20%
$250
Performance per Dollar
30.0+21%
24.8
Codename
Neptune CF
Release
March 1 2014
January 6 2025
Ranking
#348
#386