
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:

Arc Graphics 130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is positioned at rank 408 and the Arc Graphics 130T is on rank 239, so the Arc Graphics 130T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130T
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2014). The Arc Graphics 130T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc Graphics 130T is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130T, it costs 20% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Arc Graphics 130T

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Arc Graphics 130T
The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the Arc Graphics 130T reaches 6,208 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the Arc Graphics 130T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130T).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,208+3% |
| Architecture | GCN | Xe+ |
| Shading Units | 2560+36471% | 7 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130T has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 512-bit (Dual) vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s (Dual) | System |
| Bus Width | 512-bit (Dual) | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 130T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 130T). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs Xe Media Engine.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the Arc Graphics 130T's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130T). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 30.0 | 413.9+1280% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire costs 20% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 24.8 (Arc Graphics 130T) — the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 21% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Arc Graphics 130T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $300-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-20% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0+21% | 24.8 |
| Codename | Neptune CF | — |
| Release | March 1 2014 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #348 | #386 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















