
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs Radeon R9 280X

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is positioned at rank #408 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 280X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 280X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 280X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $200), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 238.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+238.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and Radeon R9 280X

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.

Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the Radeon R9 280X reaches 6,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 6,100+2% |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1000 MHz+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 6.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 512-bit (Dual) vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+7% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 512-bit (Dual)+33% | 384-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 280X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 30.0 | 30.5+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 280X costs 70% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 101.7 (Radeon R9 280X) — the Radeon R9 280X offers 239% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $299-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $60-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0 | 101.7+239% |
| Codename | Neptune CF | Tahiti |
| Release | March 1 2014 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #348 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















