Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
RTX A400
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs RTX A400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅26.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌492.6% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.5 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $665 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 490.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire scores 6,000 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is built on GCN while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 768 (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1762 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,000 | 5,983 |
| Architecture | GCN | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1762 MHz+96% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 512-bit (Dual) on the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and 128-bit on the RTX A400.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit (Dual)+300% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire draws 200W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 120% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 30.0 | 119.7+299% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire came in at $800, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 83.1% cheaper ($665 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 490.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $135-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 44.3+491% |
| Codename | Neptune CF | GA107 |
| Release | March 1 2014 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #348 | #397 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire and RTX A400
