
FirePro W9000

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
FirePro W9000 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro W9000 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro W9000 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro W9000
2012Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌399.9% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 7.5 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌37% higher power demand at 274W vs 200W.
- ❌27800% longer card at 279mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 387.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 274W, a 74W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 279mm, a 278mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W9000 vs Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W9000
The FirePro W9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 14 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,157 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W9000 scores 6,157 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W9000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro W9000) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,157+3% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W9000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire carries 4 GB. FirePro W9000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the FirePro W9000 and 512-bit (Dual) on the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W9000) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W9000) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W9000 draws 274W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 31.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W9000) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 279mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 200W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 279mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 93°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 22.5 | 30.0+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro W9000 came in at $3999, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire was 80% cheaper ($3199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (FirePro W9000) vs 7.5 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire offers 400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | FirePro W9000 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3999 | $800-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 7.5+400% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Neptune CF |
| Release | June 14 2012 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #390 | #348 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















