CPU
GPU
Quadro K5200
Popular choices:
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K5200 is positioned at rank 254 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is on rank 408, so the Quadro K5200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K5200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $200), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 192.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+192.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K5200 and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
The Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2014. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K5200 scores 6,149 and the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro K5200) vs 2,560 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Boost clocks: 771 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,149+2% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Boost Clock | 771 MHz | 900 MHz+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K5200 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire has 4 GB. The Quadro K5200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) vs 307.2 GB/s (Dual) (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — a 45.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit (Dual).
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s (Dual)+46% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit (Dual)+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K5200 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5200) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 41.0+37% | 30.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K5200 launched at $2250 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire launched at $800 and now averages $200. The Quadro K5200 costs 65% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 87.8 (Quadro K5200) vs 30.0 (Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire) — the Quadro K5200 offers 192.7% better value.
| Feature | Quadro K5200 | Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2250 | $800-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-65% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 87.8+193% | 30.0 |
| Codename | GK110B | Neptune CF |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 1 2014 |
| Ranking | #391 | #348 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
