Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 560 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M360 is positioned at rank #443 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360

#433

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1792%

#435

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1624%

#436

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1620%

#440

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1473%

#441

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1463%

#443

Radeon R9 M360

MSRP: $300|Avg: $81

100%

#444

Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

99%

#445

Radeon R9 M365X

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

98%

#446

GeForce 7800 GS

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

97%

#447

Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#448

Radeon R9 M265X

MSRP: $200|Avg: $30

96%

#449

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

96%

#450

Radeon R5 M435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

95%

#451

Radeon E8860

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

93%

#452

Radeon HD 7650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

92%

#453

Radeon R7 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

#454

GeForce 820A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

92%

#455

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600/8700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

#456

Radeon HD 7850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

91%

#457

Radeon HD 7660G + HD 7730M Dual

MSRP: $160|Avg: $40

91%

#458

Radeon HD 8550G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M360.

Insight	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $81 (vs $150), it costs 46% less, resulting in a 82.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+82.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($81)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M360 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 560 SE Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M360 and GeForce GTX 560 SE

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

GeForce GTX 560 SE

The GeForce GTX 560 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,847 points. Launch price was $89.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M360 scores 1,819 and the GeForce GTX 560 SE reaches 1,847 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 560 SE uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 560 SE).

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,819	1,847+2%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+78%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS+12%	0.8479 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	128 KB	384 KB+200%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 560 SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M360) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the GeForce GTX 560 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
DirectX	12_0	12_0
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
Encoder	VCE 1.0	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	UVD 3.1	NVDEC 1st Gen

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M360 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 560 SE's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M360) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 560 SE). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 M360	GeForce GTX 560 SE
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	Mobile	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	210mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	24.3+98%	12.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $81, while the GeForce GTX 560 SE launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M360 costs 46% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12.3 (GeForce GTX 560 SE) — the Radeon R9 M360 offers 82.9% better value. The Radeon R9 M360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).