
Radeon R9 M360 vs GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 675M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M360 is positioned at rank 443 and the GeForce GTX 675M is on rank 129, so the GeForce GTX 675M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 675M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 675M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M360.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 675M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M360 and GeForce GTX 675M

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

GeForce GTX 675M
The GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 620 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,855 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M360 scores 1,819 and the GeForce GTX 675M reaches 1,855 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 675M uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 675M). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360) vs 0.9523 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 675M).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,819 | 1,855+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 0.9523 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 675M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 675M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M360) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 675M) — the GeForce GTX 675M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 675M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 675M). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD VP4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | No NVENC (Fermi) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M360 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 675M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M360) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 675M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3+31% | 18.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | GeForce GTX 675M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $81 | — |
| Codename | Tropo | GF114 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #711 | #704 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















