
Radeon R9 M360 vs Intel UHD Graphics P630

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:

Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M360 is positioned at rank 443 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 is on rank 263, so the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M360 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M360 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $81 for the Radeon R9 M360, it costs 38% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 64.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+64.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M360 and Intel UHD Graphics P630

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M360 scores 1,819 and the Intel UHD Graphics P630 reaches 1,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360) vs 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,819 | 1,848+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 512+167% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS+106% | 0.4608 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1200 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 16+433% | 3 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M360 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs Gen 9.5.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | Gen 9.5 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M360 draws 75W versus the Intel UHD Graphics P630's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M360) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3 | 123.2+407% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $81, while the Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 costs 38.3% less ($31 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) — the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers 64.4% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $100-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $81 | $50-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5 | 37.0+64% |
| Codename | Tropo | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #711 | #640 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















