
Radeon R9 M360 vs Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon R9 M360
Popular choices:

Iris Plus Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M360 is positioned at rank #443 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R9 M360 is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R9 M360 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $81 for the Radeon R9 M360, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 99.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M360 and Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon R9 M360
The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

Iris Plus Graphics
The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M360 scores 1,819 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,819+2% | 1,789 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 11.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1000 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M360 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs QuickSync.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | QuickSync |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | QuickSync |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M360 draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M360) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 24.3 | 119.3+391% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $81, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 50.6% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 98.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M360 | Iris Plus Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $100-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $81 | $40-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5 | 44.7+99% |
| Codename | Tropo | Ice Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #711 | #714 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















