Radeon R9 M360
VS
Iris Plus Graphics

Radeon R9 M360 vs Iris Plus Graphics

AMD

Radeon R9 M360

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M360 is positioned at rank #443 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M360

#433
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1792%
#435
1624%
#436
1620%
#440
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1473%
#441
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1463%
#443
Radeon R9 M360
MSRP: $300|Avg: $81
100%
#444
Radeon HD 8550G + 7600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#445
Radeon R9 M365X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
98%
#446
GeForce 7800 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
97%
#447
Radeon HD 8650G + 7670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#448
Radeon R9 M265X
MSRP: $200|Avg: $30
96%
#449
Mobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
96%
#450
Radeon R5 M435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#451
Radeon E8860
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#452
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
92%
#453
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
#454
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#455
92%
#456
91%
#457
Radeon HD 7850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
91%
#458
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R9 M360 is significantly newer (2015 vs 0). The Radeon R9 M360 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Iris Plus Graphics.

InsightRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Iris Plus Graphics offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $81 for the Radeon R9 M360, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 99.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+99.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($81)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M360 and Iris Plus Graphics

AMD

Radeon R9 M360

The Radeon R9 M360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,819 points.

Intel

Iris Plus Graphics

The Iris Plus Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M360 scores 1,819 and the Iris Plus Graphics reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M360) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
G3D Mark Score
1,819+2%
1,789
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Generation 11.0
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1000 MHz+8%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M360 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics has 0 MB. The Radeon R9 M360 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 12_1 (Iris Plus Graphics). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
DirectX
12_0
12_1
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 M360) vs QuickSync (Iris Plus Graphics). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs QuickSync.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
Encoder
VCE 1.0
QuickSync
Decoder
UVD 3.1
QuickSync
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M360 draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M360) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
Mobile
Integrated
Length
1mm
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
24.3
119.3+391%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M360 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $81, while the Iris Plus Graphics launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Iris Plus Graphics costs 50.6% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Radeon R9 M360) vs 44.7 (Iris Plus Graphics) — the Iris Plus Graphics offers 98.7% better value.

FeatureRadeon R9 M360Iris Plus Graphics
MSRP
$300
$100-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$81
$40-51%
Performance per Dollar
22.5
44.7+99%
Codename
Tropo
Ice Lake GT2
Release
May 5 2015
sem dados
Ranking
#711
#714