Radeon R9 M380
VS
GRID K2

Radeon R9 M380 vs GRID K2

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS

GRID K2

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M380 is positioned at rank 379 and the GRID K2 is on rank 381, so the Radeon R9 M380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380

#369
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1184%
#371
1073%
#372
1070%
#376
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
973%
#377
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
967%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
96%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
94%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
93%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
92%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K2

#365
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
27874%
#380
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
100%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
100%
#382
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
89%
#383
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
83%
#384
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
81%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
81%
#386
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
79%
#387
GRID V100D-8Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $10000
79%
#388
GRID M10-0Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150
75%
#389
GRID V100-2Q
MSRP: $10000|Avg: $2000
72%
#390
Quadro FX 560
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
72%
#391
Quadro FX 5800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $40
66%
#392
FireStream 9170
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $20
60%
#393
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
60%
#394
Quadro FX 1700
MSRP: $699|Avg: $500
58%
#395
GRID P40-6Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K2.

InsightRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID K2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $300), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 273% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+273%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M380 and GRID K2

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M380 scores 2,752 and the GRID K2 reaches 2,737 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M380 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID K2 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1,536 (GRID K2). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2).

FeatureRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
G3D Mark Score
2,752
2,737
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1536 ×2+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.536 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS ×2+49%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
48
128 ×2+167%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M380 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K2 has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) vs 512 KB (GRID K2) — the GRID K2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M380 draws 75W versus the GRID K2's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M380) vs 350W (GRID K2). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
TDP
75W-67%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
36.7+201%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GRID K2 launched at $5199 and now averages $80. The GRID K2 costs 73.3% less ($220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 34.2 (GRID K2) — the GRID K2 offers 271.7% better value. The Radeon R9 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 M380GRID K2
MSRP
$300-94%
$5199
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$80-73%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
34.2+272%
Codename
Strato
GK104
Release
May 5 2015
May 11 2013
Ranking
#607
#611