Radeon R9 M380
VS
Radeon Pro 450

Radeon R9 M380 vs Radeon Pro 450

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M380 is positioned at rank #379 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380

#369
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1184%
#371
1073%
#372
1070%
#376
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
973%
#377
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
967%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#381
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
96%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
95%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
95%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
94%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
94%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
93%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
92%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 450.

InsightRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro 450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $300), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 642.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+642.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon Pro 450

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M380 scores 2,752 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M380 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,752+1%
2,723
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.536 TFLOPS+50%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
48+20%
40
L1 Cache
192 KB+20%
160 KB
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M380 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_0
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
UVD 6.0
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M380 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M380) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
TDP
75W
35W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
36.7
77.8+112%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 68.1 (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers 640.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon R9 M380Radeon Pro 450
MSRP
$300
$0-100%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$40-87%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
68.1+640%
Codename
Strato
Baffin
Release
May 5 2015
October 30 2016
Ranking
#607
#612