
Radeon R9 M380 vs Radeon HD 8950

Radeon R9 M380
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M380 is positioned at rank #379 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $300 (vs $499), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 61.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M380 and Radeon HD 8950

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M380 scores 2,752 and the Radeon HD 8950 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M380 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8950 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,752 | 2,828+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+87% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M380 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8950 has 3 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 8950) — the Radeon HD 8950 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M380 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8950's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M380) vs 500W (Radeon HD 8950). Power connectors: Mobile vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+160% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 and now averages $499. The Radeon R9 M380 costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 61.4% better value. The Radeon R9 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-40% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-40% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+61% | 5.7 |
| Codename | Strato | Tahiti |
| Release | May 5 2015 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #607 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















