
Radeon R9 M380 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

Radeon R9 M380
Popular choices:

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M380 is positioned at rank 379 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is on rank 393, so the Radeon R9 M380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 96% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 2760.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2760.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M380 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M380 scores 2,752 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M380 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2617 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,752 | 2,747 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 24064+3033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+8103% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2617 MHz+162% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 752+1467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 23.5 MB+12268% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M380 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — a 1766.7% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+1767% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M380 draws 75W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 155.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M380) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-88% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+698% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The Radeon R9 M380 costs 96.5% less ($8265 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 2966.7% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-96% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-96% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+2967% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Strato | GB202 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #607 | #609 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















