
Radeon R9 M380

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Radeon R9 M380 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M380 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 M380 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $8,265 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- β Delivers 2760.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- β Draws 75W instead of 600W, a 525W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
2025Why buy it
- β 175.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025β2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- β More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025β2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2755% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- β700% higher power demand at 600W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M380 scores 2,752 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M380 is built on GCN 2.0 while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2617 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,752 | 2,747 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 24064+3033% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.536 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+8103% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2617 MHz+162% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 752+1467% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 23.5 MB+12268% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) vs 1792 GB/s (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) β a 1766.7% advantage for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380 and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) β the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 1792 GB/s+1767% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 128 MB+51100% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M380 draws 75W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W β a 155.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M380) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-88% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 304mm |
| Height | 0mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+698% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M380 came in at $300, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 96.5% cheaper ($8265 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) β the Radeon R9 M380 offers 2966.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M380 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-96% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2+2967% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Strato | GB202 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #607 | #609 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














