Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M380

NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 76.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 399.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,499 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 395.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K4100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (2,773 vs 2,752), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K4100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,199 cheaper on MSRP at $300 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 395.9% (9.2 vs 1.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380).

FeatureQuadro K4100MRadeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,773
2,752
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1152+50%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.627 TFLOPS+6%
1.536 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
96+100%
48
L1 Cache
96 KB
192 KB+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K4100MRadeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K4100M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro K4100M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K4100MRadeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro K4100MRadeon R9 M380
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
27.7
36.7+32%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4100M came in at $1499, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M380 was 80% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Radeon R9 M380 offers 411.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M380 (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K4100MRadeon R9 M380
MSRP
$1499
$300-80%
Performance per Dollar
1.8
9.2+411%
Codename
GK104
Strato
Release
July 23 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#604
#607

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.