Quadro K4100M vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025Core: 1590 MHzBoost: 2617 MHz
Similar parts
·

Quadro K4100M vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4100M vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4100M vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $7,066 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • Delivers 476.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 100W instead of 600W, a 500W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

2025

Why buy it

  • 56.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 471.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $8,565 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
  • 500% higher power demand at 600W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K4100M instead at 2,773 vs 2,747, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 188 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K4100M makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,066 cheaper on MSRP at $1,499 vs $8,565, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 476.8% (1.8 vs 0.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K4100M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4100M vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

NVIDIA

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q).

FeatureQuadro K4100MRTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
G3D Mark Score
2,773
2,747
Architecture
Kepler
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1152
24064+1989%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.627 TFLOPS
126 TFLOPS+7644%
ROPs
32
192+500%
TMUs
96
752+683%
L1 Cache
0.09 MB
23.5 MB+26011%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
128 MB+25500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K4100M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureQuadro K4100MRTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q carries 2 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M and 512-bit on the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4100M) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K4100MRTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR7
Bus Width
64-bit
512-bit+700%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
128 MB+25500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 142.9% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K4100MRTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
TDP
100W-83%
600W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
304mm
Height
137mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
27.7+502%
4.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4100M came in at $1499, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565. On MSRP, Quadro K4100M was 82.5% cheaper ($7066 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the Quadro K4100M offers 500% better value. The newer card here is RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K4100MRTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
MSRP
$1499-82%
$8565
Performance per Dollar
1.8+500%
0.3
Codename
GK104
GB202
Release
July 23 2013
March 18 2025
Ranking
#604
#609

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.