Quadro K4100M vs Radeon HD 6970

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon HD 6970 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon HD 6970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
306.2% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$369 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.8 vs 7.7 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6970

2010

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,130 less on MSRP ($369 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 314.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6970 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (2,831 vs 2,773), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6970 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,130 cheaper on MSRP at $369 vs $1,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 314.7% (7.7 vs 1.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6970 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K4100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K4100M vs Radeon HD 6970 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon HD 6970

The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the Radeon HD 6970 reaches 2,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970).

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon HD 6970
G3D Mark Score	2,773	2,831+2%
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1152	1536+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+66%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	96	96
L1 Cache	96 KB	192 KB+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon HD 6970
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6970.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon HD 6970
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon HD 6970
TDP	100W-60%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	—	286mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	90
Perf/Watt	27.7+145%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4100M came in at $1499, while the Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6970 was 75.4% cheaper ($1130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) vs 7.7 (Radeon HD 6970) — the Radeon HD 6970 offers 327.8% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K4100M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon HD 6970
MSRP	$1499	$369-75%
Performance per Dollar	1.8	7.7+328%
Codename	GK104	Cayman
Release	July 23 2013	December 14 2010
Ranking	#604	#596

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6970 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.