Quadro K4100M vs Quadro M620

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K4100M vs Quadro M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K4100M vs Quadro M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅44.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quadro M620

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K4100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K4100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (2,773 vs 2,758), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K4100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K4100M vs Quadro M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620).

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Quadro M620
G3D Mark Score	2,773	2,758
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1152+125%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS+63%	1 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	96 KB	256 KB+167%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Quadro M620
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M620 carries 2 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M and 64-bit on the Quadro M620. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4100M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Quadro M620
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Quadro M620
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	27.7	91.9+232%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K4100M came in at $1499, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) vs Infinity (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Quadro M620
MSRP	$1499	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.8	Infinity
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	July 23 2013	January 11 2017
Ranking	#604	#606

Search Quadro K4100M on Amazon

Search Quadro M620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.