GRID K280Q
Quadro K4100M
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K4100M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K4100M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K4100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID K280Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 1.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
Quadro K4100M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID K280Q vs Quadro K4100M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GRID K280Q
The GRID K280Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.
Quadro K4100M
The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K280Q scores 2,840 and the Quadro K4100M reaches 2,773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K280Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro K4100M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K280Q) vs 1,152 (Quadro K4100M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K280Q) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M).
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,840+2% | 2,773 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+33% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS+41% | 1.627 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID K280Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4100M carries 4 GB. Quadro K4100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K280Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K4100M.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K280Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K4100M's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K4100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K280Q) vs 350W (Quadro K4100M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 100W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.6 | 27.7+120% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID K280Q came in at $2000, while the Quadro K4100M launched at $1499. On MSRP, Quadro K4100M was 25.1% cheaper ($501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.4 (GRID K280Q) vs 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) — the Quadro K4100M offers 28.6% better value.
| Feature | GRID K280Q | Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $1499-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4 | 1.8+29% |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #595 | #604 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K280Q and Quadro K4100M
