
GeForce MX350

Radeon R9 M380
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX350
2020Why buy it
- ✅22.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 M380 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 75W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 11.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌275% higher power demand at 75W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828+3% | 2,752 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 1000 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+25% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX350 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 56 GB/s (GeForce MX350) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) — a 71.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 M380. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce MX350) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce MX350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 56 GB/s | 96 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-73% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+285% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce MX350 was 16.7% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce MX350 offers 22.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3+23% | 9.2 |
| Codename | GP107 | Strato |
| Release | February 10 2020 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #597 | #607 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














