
Quadro M620

Radeon R9 M380
Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M620
2017Why buy it
- ✅22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758 | 2,752 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz | 1000 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.0.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-60% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9+150% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M620) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 9.2 |
| Codename | GM107 | Strato |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #606 | #607 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














