Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380

NVIDIA

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M620

2017

Why buy it

  • 22.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M380

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M620 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M620 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 22.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (2,758 vs 2,752), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2017 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M620 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score
2,758
2,752
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1000 MHz+2%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M380 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_0)
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.0.

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
Encoder
NVENC 5th Gen
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 2nd Gen
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
TDP
30W-60%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
1mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
91.9+150%
36.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M620 came in at $0, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M620) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M620Radeon R9 M380
MSRP
$0-100%
$300
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
9.2
Codename
GM107
Strato
Release
January 11 2017
May 5 2015
Ranking
#606
#607

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.