Quadro M620 vs Radeon R9 M380

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz

Radeon R9 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M620

2,758

+0.2%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon R9 M380

2,752

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M380

#369

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1184%

#371

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1073%

#372

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1070%

#376

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

973%

#377

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

967%

#379

Radeon R9 M380

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#381

Radeon HD 7640G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

99%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

96%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

95%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

95%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

94%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

94%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

93%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

92%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M380 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $300), it costs 87% less, resulting in a 651.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+651.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M620 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 M380 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and Radeon R9 M380

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

Radeon R9 M380

The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Radeon R9 M380 reaches 2,752 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
G3D Mark Score	2,758	2,752
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+54%
Boost Clock	977 MHz	1000 MHz+2%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M380 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_0)
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 6.0.

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
Encoder	NVENC 5th Gen	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	UVD 6.0
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro M620	Radeon R9 M380
TDP	30W-60%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	1mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	91.9+150%	36.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 M380 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Quadro M620 costs 86.7% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs 9.2 (Radeon R9 M380) — the Quadro M620 offers 650% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).