
GeForce MX350

Quadro M620
GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX350
2020Why buy it
- ✅0.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro M620 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX350 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 20W instead of 30W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2020 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quadro M620
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX350 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 30W vs 20W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 977 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,828+3% | 2,758 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+25% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.199 TFLOPS+20% | 1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 937 MHz | 977 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 256 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX350 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX350 and 64-bit on the Quadro M620. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 20W-33% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.4+54% | 91.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX350 came in at $250, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.3 (GeForce MX350) vs Infinity (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX350 (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce MX350 | Quadro M620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | GM107 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #597 | #606 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














