GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M620

GeForce MX350

2020Core: 747 MHzBoost: 937 MHz

Quadro M620

2017Core: 756 MHzBoost: 977 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce MX350

2,828

+2.5%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Quadro M620

2,758

0.0%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX350 is positioned at rank #348 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350

#338

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

960%

#340

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

870%

#341

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

868%

#345

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

789%

#346

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

784%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

100%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

98%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

96%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

94%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

94%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

94%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

93%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce MX350 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce MX350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M620.

Insight	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Longevity	Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $200 for the GeForce MX350, it costs 80% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 387.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+387.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)	✅More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX350 Benchmark Check

Quadro M620 Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX350 and Quadro M620

GeForce MX350

The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.

Quadro M620

The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX350 scores 2,828 and the Quadro M620 reaches 2,758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX350 is built on Pascal while the Quadro M620 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce MX350) vs 512 (Quadro M620). Raw compute: 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350) vs 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620). Boost clocks: 937 MHz vs 977 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
G3D Mark Score	2,828+3%	2,758
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640+25%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.199 TFLOPS+20%	1 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	937 MHz	977 MHz+4%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	240 KB	256 KB+7%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) vs 2 MB (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX350 draws 20W versus the Quadro M620's 30W — a 40% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX350) vs 350W (Quadro M620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX350	Quadro M620
TDP	20W-33%	30W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	141.4+54%	91.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce MX350 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro M620 launched at $0 and now averages $40. The Quadro M620 costs 80% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (GeForce MX350) vs 69.0 (Quadro M620) — the Quadro M620 offers 389.4% better value. The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).