
Quadro M620

Radeon HD 6970
Quadro M620 vs Radeon HD 6970 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M620 vs Radeon HD 6970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M620 vs Radeon HD 6970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M620
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
- β Measures 1mm instead of 286mm, a 285mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- β More future proof: Maxwell (2014β2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 6970 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6970
2010Why buy it
- β 58.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($369 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.
- β28500% longer card at 286mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M620 vs Radeon HD 6970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

Radeon HD 6970
The Radeon HD 6970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,831 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Radeon HD 6970 reaches 2,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6970 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6970). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6970). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758 | 2,831+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1536+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+170% |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz+11% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M620 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6970. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6970) β the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 11.0 (Radeon HD 6970). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs None (Radeon HD 6970). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 3.0.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | β | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6970's 250W β a 157.1% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 550W (Radeon HD 6970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 286mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 286mm |
| Height | β | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | β | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9+713% | 11.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M620 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6970 launched at $369. On MSRP, Quadro M620 was 100+% cheaper ($369 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M620) vs 7.7 (Radeon HD 6970) β the Quadro M620 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M620 (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $369 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 7.7 |
| Codename | GM107 | Cayman |
| Release | January 11 2017 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #606 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














