
Quadro M620 vs RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

Quadro M620
Popular choices:

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $8,565 for the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q, it costs 100% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 21398.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+21398.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,565) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q

Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.

RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q
The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1590 MHz to 2617 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $8,565.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q reaches 2,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 24,064 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 126 TFLOPS (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 2617 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758 | 2,747 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 24064+4600% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 126 TFLOPS+12500% |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz | 2617 MHz+168% |
| ROPs | 16 | 192+1100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 752+2250% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 23.5 MB+9300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 128 MB (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 512-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 128 MB+6300% |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs NVDEC 6th Gen.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | — | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q's 600W — a 181% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 350W (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 304mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-95% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 304mm |
| Height | — | 137mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9+1898% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q launched at $8565 and now averages $8565. The Quadro M620 costs 99.5% less ($8525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs 0.3 (RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q) — the Quadro M620 offers 22900% better value. The RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell DC-12Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $8565 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-100% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.0+22900% | 0.3 |
| Codename | GM107 | GB202 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #606 | #609 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















