Quadro M620 vs Radeon HD 8950
Quadro M620
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8950
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M620.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M620 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $499), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1116.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1116.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($499) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M620 and Radeon HD 8950
Quadro M620
The Quadro M620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 756 MHz to 977 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,758 points.
Radeon HD 8950
The Radeon HD 8950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M620 scores 2,758 and the Radeon HD 8950 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M620 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8950 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M620) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 8950). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Quadro M620) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8950). Boost clocks: 977 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,758 | 2,828+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1792+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+187% |
| Boost Clock | 977 MHz | 1250 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 112+250% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 448 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8950 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 8950 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M620) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8950) — the Quadro M620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Quadro M620) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8950). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th Gen (Quadro M620) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 8950). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd Gen | UVD 3.1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M620 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 8950's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Quadro M620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M620) vs 500W (Radeon HD 8950). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 91.9+552% | 14.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M620 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 8950 launched at $499 and now averages $499. The Quadro M620 costs 92% less ($459 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 69.0 (Quadro M620) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 8950) — the Quadro M620 offers 1110.5% better value. The Quadro M620 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M620 | Radeon HD 8950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-92% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.0+1111% | 5.7 |
| Codename | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 11 2017 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #606 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M620 and Radeon HD 8950
