Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon 820M
Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:
Radeon 820M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M385 is positioned at rank 420 and the Radeon 820M is on rank 62, so the Radeon 820M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 820M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 820M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Radeon 820M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M385 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 820M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 M385 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 820M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $25 versus $60 for the Radeon R9 M385, it costs 58% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 149.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+149.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon 820M
Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Radeon 820M
The Radeon 820M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,143 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M385 scores 2,061 and the Radeon 820M reaches 2,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 128 (Radeon 820M). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,143+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+600% | 128 |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2900 MHz+164% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M385 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 820M has 2 GB. The Radeon R9 M385 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M385 draws 75W versus the Radeon 820M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385) vs 350W (Radeon 820M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 71.4+160% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 820M costs 58.3% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 85.7 (Radeon 820M) — the Radeon 820M offers 149.1% better value. The Radeon 820M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon 820M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $25-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.4 | 85.7+149% |
| Codename | Strato | Krackan Point |
| Release | May 5 2015 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #674 | #669 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon 820M
