Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon TM R9 A360

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon TM R9 A360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 M385

2015

Why buy it

✅69.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon TM R9 A360

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M385 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M385 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 69.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0% in PassMark G3D (2,061 vs 2,060), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M385 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M385 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon TM R9 A360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M385

The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M385 scores 2,061 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 M385	Radeon TM R9 A360
G3D Mark Score	2,061	2,060
Architecture	GCN 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896+75%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.792 TFLOPS+89%	0.9472 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1100 MHz+19%	925 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56+75%	32
L1 Cache	224 KB+75%	128 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M385	Radeon TM R9 A360
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M385 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385 and 64-bit on the Radeon TM R9 A360.

Feature	Radeon R9 M385	Radeon TM R9 A360
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M385 draws 75W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 M385	Radeon TM R9 A360
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	27.5	68.7+150%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 M385 came in at $300, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon TM R9 A360 was 100+% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value.

Feature	Radeon R9 M385	Radeon TM R9 A360
MSRP	$300	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	6.9	Infinity
Codename	Strato	Tropo
Release	May 5 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#674	#711

Search Radeon R9 M385 on Amazon

Search Radeon TM R9 A360 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.