
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 540

Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 540
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M385 is positioned at rank 420 and the Radeon RX 540 is on rank 235, so the Radeon RX 540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 540
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 540 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M385.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 540 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 540 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $60), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon RX 540

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M385 scores 2,061 and the Radeon RX 540 reaches 2,134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 512 (Radeon RX 540). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,134+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+44% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1219 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M385) vs 80 GB/s (Radeon RX 540) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M385. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s+20% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M385 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 540's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385) vs 350W (Radeon RX 540). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 42.7+55% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon RX 540 launched at $99 and now averages $40. The Radeon RX 540 costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 53.4 (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 55.2% better value. The Radeon RX 540 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $99-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $40-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.4 | 53.4+55% |
| Codename | Strato | Lexa |
| Release | May 5 2015 | November 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #674 | #602 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















