
Radeon R9 M385

Radeon RX 540
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 540 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 540 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 540: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M385
2015Why buy it
- ✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌203% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 21.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 540
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 213.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.6 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Radeon R9 M385 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 540 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M385 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX 540 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.

Radeon RX 540
The Radeon RX 540 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 11 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1124 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,134 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M385 scores 2,061 and the Radeon RX 540 reaches 2,134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 540 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 512 (Radeon RX 540). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 540). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 1219 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,134+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+44% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 1219 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+75% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 540 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M385 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M385) vs 80 GB/s (Radeon RX 540) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M385. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 540. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M385) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s+20% | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M385 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 540's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 540 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385) vs 350W (Radeon RX 540). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 42.7+55% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M385 came in at $300, while the Radeon RX 540 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 540 was 67% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 21.6 (Radeon RX 540) — the Radeon RX 540 offers 213% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 540 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon RX 540 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $99-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9 | 21.6+213% |
| Codename | Strato | Lexa |
| Release | May 5 2015 | November 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #674 | #602 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














