
Radeon R9 M385

Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M385
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.9 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌74.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 43W.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
2025Why buy it
- ✅70.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 75W, a 32W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,044 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M385 scores 2,061 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U reaches 2,044 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M385 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Boost clocks: 1100 MHz vs 2300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,061 | 2,044 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1792+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+820% |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 2300 MHz+109% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 512 KB+129% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M385 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 M385 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M385 and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M385 draws 75W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U's 43W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M385) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U). Power connectors: Mobile vs None.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 43W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Perf/Watt | 27.5 | 47.5+73% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M385 came in at $300, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M385 was 33.3% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon R9 M385) vs 4.5 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U) — the Radeon R9 M385 offers 53.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M385 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4700U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-33% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9+53% | 4.5 |
| Codename | Strato | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #674 | #229 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













