Radeon R9 M395
VS
GeForce GTX 460 OEM

Radeon R9 M395 vs GeForce GTX 460 OEM

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

2010Core: 650 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R9 M395
75
4,934
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M380
brand logoRadeon HD 6990M
brand logoRadeon 680M
brand logoRadeon R9 270
brand logoRadeon R9 390X
brand logoRadeon RX 6800M
brand logoRadeon 8060S
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
GeForce GTX 460 OEM
150
5,000
+1.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770M
brand logoGeForce GTX 590
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 660 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 5GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M395 is positioned at rank #283 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395

#61
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
MSRP: $800|Avg: $350
94%
#273
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
660%
#275
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
598%
#276
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
597%
#280
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
543%
#281
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
539%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
100%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
99%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
97%
#291
GeForce MX250
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#292
Radeon 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#293
GeForce MX330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
95%
#297
Radeon RX 780
MSRP: $499|Avg: $721
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395.

InsightRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Performance
❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
—
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 460 OEM remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M395 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 OEM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low158 FPS
medium115 FPS
high92 FPS
ultra67 FPS
1440p
low102 FPS
medium70 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra40 FPS
4K
low31 FPS
medium24 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra14 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low57 FPS
medium33 FPS
high30 FPS
ultra23 FPS
1440p
low38 FPS
medium22 FPS
high21 FPS
ultra16 FPS
4K
low12 FPS
medium8 FPS
high7 FPS
ultra5 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low133 FPS
medium90 FPS
high55 FPS
ultra31 FPS
1440p
low62 FPS
medium48 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra17 FPS
4K
low24 FPS
medium18 FPS
high11 FPS
ultra8 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low123 FPS
medium80 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra41 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS
medium52 FPS
high34 FPS
ultra21 FPS
4K
low27 FPS
medium18 FPS
high13 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low222 FPS
medium178 FPS
high148 FPS
ultra111 FPS
1440p
low167 FPS
medium133 FPS
high111 FPS
ultra83 FPS
4K
low111 FPS
medium89 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra56 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low225 FPS
medium180 FPS
high150 FPS
ultra112 FPS
1440p
low169 FPS
medium135 FPS
high112 FPS
ultra84 FPS
4K
low80 FPS
medium67 FPS
high59 FPS
ultra39 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low119 FPS
medium102 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra52 FPS
1440p
low56 FPS
medium47 FPS
high37 FPS
ultra26 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium28 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low99 FPS
medium75 FPS
high61 FPS
ultra44 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS
medium63 FPS
high48 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low48 FPS
medium37 FPS
high22 FPS
ultra17 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and GeForce GTX 460 OEM

AMD

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 460 OEM

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 11 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M395 scores 4,934 and the GeForce GTX 460 OEM reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395 is built on GCN while the GeForce GTX 460 OEM uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
G3D Mark Score
4,934
5,000+1%
Architecture
GCN
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1792+433%
336
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) vs 108.8 GB/s (GeForce GTX 460 OEM) — a 61.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
176 GB/s+62%
108.8 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
DirectX
12 (FL12_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3+50%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon R9 M395) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Decoder: VCE vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 OEM).

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
Encoder
UVD
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
VCE
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M395 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 460 OEM's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M395 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 OEM). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
TDP
75W-50%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
Mobile
2x 6-pin
Length
0mm
210mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
65.8+98%
33.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M395 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon R9 M395GeForce GTX 460 OEM
MSRP
$300
—
Avg Price (30d)
$300
—
Codename
—
GF104
Release
June 9 2015
October 11 2010
Ranking
#445
#829