
Radeon R9 M395
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M395 is positioned at rank #283 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The M1 8-Core GPU uses modern memory architecture. The M1 8-Core GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The M1 8-Core GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015)) | Legacy (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the M1 8-Core GPU remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and M1 8-Core GPU

Radeon R9 M395
The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M395 scores 4,934 and the M1 8-Core GPU reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,934 | 5,000+1% |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+22300% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M395) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) — a 158.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 M395. Bus width: 256-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s+159% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_0) (Radeon R9 M395) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_0) | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon R9 M395) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: VCE vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | VCE | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M395 draws 75W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 65.8 | 166.7+153% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) — the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The M1 8-Core GPU is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M395 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.4 | Infinity |
| Release | June 9 2015 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #445 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















