Radeon R9 M395 vs Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Radeon R9 M395

2015Core: 834 MHz

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R9 M395

4,934

0.0%

5,000

+1.3%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R9 M395 is positioned at rank 283 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) is on rank 139, so the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M395

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

94%

#273

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

660%

#275

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

598%

#276

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

597%

#280

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

543%

#281

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

539%

#283

Radeon R9 M395

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#285

GeForce GT 755M SLI

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

99%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

98%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

97%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 (móvel)

#70

Radeon PRO W6800

MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249

90%

#123

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1477%

#138

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

100%

#140

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

99%

#141

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

99%

#142

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

98%

#143

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

96%

#144

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

96%

#145

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

95%

#146

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

94%

#147

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

92%

#148

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

92%

#150

FirePro M40003

MSRP: $150|Avg: $72

91%

#151

Radeon Pro 465

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

#153

Tesla P4

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M395 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M395.

Insight	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN (2012−2015))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $300 for the Radeon R9 M395, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 153.3% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+153.3%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 M395 Benchmark Check

Quadro T1000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M395 and Quadro T1000 (móvel)

Radeon R9 M395

The Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2015. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock speed is 834 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,934 points.

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M395 scores 4,934 and the Quadro T1000 (móvel) reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M395 is built on GCN while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)).

Feature	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,934	5,000+1%
Architecture	GCN	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M395 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M395 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000 (móvel)'s 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M395) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 M395	Quadro T1000 (móvel)
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	65.8	100.0+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M395 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Quadro T1000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $120. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) costs 60% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.4 (Radeon R9 M395) vs 41.7 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) — the Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 154.3% better value. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).