Radeon RX 460 vs FirePro W7000 Adapter

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W7000 Adapter

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

91%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

89%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

86%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

86%

#204

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3027%

#219

FirePro W7000 Adapter

MSRP: $899|Avg: $15

100%

#220

Quadro K420

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

99%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

98%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

98%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

93%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

93%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460.

Insight	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+6.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W7000 Adapter holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $35), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 149.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+149.5%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 460 Benchmark Check

FirePro W7000 Adapter Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 and FirePro W7000 Adapter

Radeon RX 460

The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 460 scores 4,099 versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 4,383 — the FirePro W7000 Adapter leads by 6.9%. The Radeon RX 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro W7000 Adapter uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460) vs 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter).

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
G3D Mark Score	4,099	4,383+7%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1280+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.15 TFLOPS	2.432 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	56	80+43%
L1 Cache	224 KB	320 KB+43%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460) vs 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Vulkan: Supported vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12
Vulkan	Supported	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter).

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
Encoder	VCE 3.4	VCE 1.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 460 draws 75W versus the FirePro W7000 Adapter's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460) vs 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	Radeon RX 460	FirePro W7000 Adapter
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	242mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	90°C
Perf/Watt	54.7+87%	29.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 and now averages $15. The FirePro W7000 Adapter costs 57.1% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) vs 292.2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) — the FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 149.5% better value. The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).