
Radeon RX 460 vs GRID V100D-8Q

Radeon RX 460
Popular choices:

GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID V100D-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 460 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 460 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 28079.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+28079.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 and GRID V100D-8Q

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 460 scores 4,099 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,099 | 4,156+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+40% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.15 TFLOPS+29% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1306 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 320 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 460 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 460 draws 75W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 54.7+196% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The Radeon RX 460 costs 99.7% less ($9965 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 29175% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-99% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-100% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.1+29175% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Baffin | GM107 |
| Release | August 8 2016 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #485 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















