
Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 660

Radeon RX 460
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 660
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 660.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $35), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 130% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+130%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 460 and GeForce GTX 660

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.

GeForce GTX 660
The GeForce GTX 660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 980 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,040 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 460 scores 4,099 and the GeForce GTX 660 reaches 4,040 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon RX 460) vs 960 (GeForce GTX 660). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460) vs 1.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,099+1% | 4,040 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 960+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.15 TFLOPS+9% | 1.981 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz+16% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 24+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+180% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 460 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 has 3 GB. The Radeon RX 460 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (Radeon RX 460) vs 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660) — a 28.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 660. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660) — the Radeon RX 460 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 144.2 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+163% | 0.38 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 660). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 660). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460) vs H.264 (GeForce GTX 660).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 460 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 660's 140W — a 60.5% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 460) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 170mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-46% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 170mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 54.7+89% | 28.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 460 launched at $110 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 660 launched at $229 and now averages $15. The GeForce GTX 660 costs 57.1% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 117.1 (Radeon RX 460) vs 269.3 (GeForce GTX 660) — the GeForce GTX 660 offers 130% better value. The Radeon RX 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon RX 460 | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $110-52% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $15-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.1 | 269.3+130% |
| Codename | Baffin | GK106 |
| Release | August 8 2016 | September 6 2012 |
| Ranking | #485 | #490 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















