
Radeon RX 480
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 480
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+94% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 65.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 480
2016Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+94% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 65.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,546 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.3 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Radeon RX 480?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 480 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 288 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 480 and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
The Radeon RX 480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,546 points. Launch price was $229.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 480 scores 8,546 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 94%. The Radeon RX 480 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 480) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 480) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1266 MHz vs 2655 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,546 | 16,581+94% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.834 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+273% |
| Boost Clock | 1266 MHz | 2655 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+13% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 480 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 480) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 12.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 288 GB/s+13% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon RX 480) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 480) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 480) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 480 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 9.5% difference. The Radeon RX 480 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 480) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-9% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 95mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 57.0 | 100.5+76% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 480 launched at $229 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The Radeon RX 480 costs 14.9% less ($40 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.3 (Radeon RX 480) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 65.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 480 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-15% | $269 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.3 | 61.6+65% |
| Codename | Ellesmere | Navi 33 |
| Release | June 29 2016 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #305 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












