Radeon RX 5300 vs GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 32.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-32.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+32.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $60 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 10.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX 5300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+10.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300 and GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 32.3%. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606 | 10,064+32% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+92% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 1733 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 6 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 192 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 192-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 180mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 180mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+36% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 16.7% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 152.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 10.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-48% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-17% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 152.1 | 167.7+10% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #336 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300 and GeForce GTX 1060
