Radeon RX 5300 vs GRID P40-8Q
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P40-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-8Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $150 for the GRID P40-8Q, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 204% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+204%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300 and GRID P40-8Q
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 and the GRID P40-8Q reaches 7,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GRID P40-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606+1% | 7,507 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2048+45% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+40% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 128+45% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-8Q has 4 GB. The GRID P40-8Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-8Q) — the GRID P40-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the GRID P40-8Q's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 350W (GRID P40-8Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 180mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+128% | 33.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 152.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 50.0 (GRID P40-8Q) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 204.2% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | GRID P40-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-96% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-67% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 152.1+204% | 50.0 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #336 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300 and GRID P40-8Q
