CPU
GPU
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 780
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 780
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 780 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $721 for the Radeon RX 780, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1332.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1332.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($721) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon RX 780
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Radeon RX 780
The Radeon RX 780 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,658 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 and the Radeon RX 780 reaches 7,658 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 780 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 780). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 780). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606 | 7,658 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3840+173% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 35.87 TFLOPS+674% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2335 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 780 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 780 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 780 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 780 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 780). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 780). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 780).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | RDNA 3 Dual Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 780's 180W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 350W (Radeon RX 780). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-44% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+79% | 42.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon RX 780 launched at $499 and now averages $721. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 93.1% less ($671 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 152.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 10.6 (Radeon RX 780) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 1334.9% better value. The Radeon RX 780 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-74% | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-93% | $721 |
| Performance per Dollar | 152.1+1335% | 10.6 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | September 11 2024 |
| Ranking | #336 | #131 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon RX 780
