Radeon RX 5300 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon RX 5300
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 7100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 5300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (8 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $180 for the Radeon Pro WX 7100, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 255.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+255.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 and the Radeon Pro WX 7100 reaches 7,701 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606 | 7,701+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2304+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 5.728 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+32% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 144+64% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon Pro WX 7100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 180mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 180mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1+29% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5300 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799 and now averages $180. The Radeon RX 5300 costs 72.2% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 152.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 42.8 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 255.4% better value. The Radeon RX 5300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-84% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-72% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 152.1+255% | 42.8 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 28 2020 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #336 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon Pro WX 7100
