
Radeon RX 5300

Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 5300 vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 5300 vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 5300 vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅3.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon RX 6400 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌88.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 53W.
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 100W, a 47W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 180mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌23.3% HIGHER MSRP$159 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 48.6 vs 59.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 5300 vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 5300
The Radeon RX 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,606 points.

Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5300 scores 7,606 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2321 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,606 | 7,728+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+83% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+30% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2321 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+83% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6400 is on the newer stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the Radeon RX 5300 stays on FSR Frame Generation.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5300 has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 6400 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (Radeon RX 5300) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 6400) — a 31.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5300. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the Radeon RX 5300 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 5300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+31% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 5300) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5300 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 61.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 180mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 53W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 180mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 76.1 | 145.8+92% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 5300 came in at $129, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5300 was 18.9% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 59.0 (Radeon RX 5300) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 5300 offers 21.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5300 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129-19% | $159 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.0+21% | 48.6 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #336 | #330 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














